Throughout time and ages, enemy propagandist/foe uses a number of rhetorical techniques and methods to trick, mislead and to confuse their enemies and audience.
These techniques have proven their worth and effectiveness numerous times and it is still used today. And with the massive grip of the controlled mass media around the world today, these techniques have become even more effective on the entranced world audience.
This small list shows the basic common tactics used by the foe in their efforts to attack, disrupt, confuse or to mislead their audience and/or their enemies particularly.Strawman:
This is perhaps to be the most common and widely used tactic used by our numerous enemies today.
Strawman is a logical fallacy based on the fiction falsely attributed to the National Socialist/Aryanist sources. In simple layman terms, LIES!Example:Aryanist/National-Socialist:National Socialism aspires to create a class cooperative and racially stable society where nation and its people work as one to achieve a common goal.Foe:The Nazi's are evil hate-filled racist capitalists that wanted to enslave the workers and everyone else in the nation in order to kill and enslave all non Aryans in the rest of the world.Non-Sequitor:
Another favorite rhetoric used by the foe. The word is Latin for "It does not follow". Non-Sequitor is a logical fallacy that does not follow the premise of the argument of the subject. Example:Aryanist/National-Socialist:It is very wrong to imprison an 87 year old woman for doubting the official narrative of the history!Foe:The society is constantly under attack by hate filled extremists who hates all of our freedoms! She doesn’t believe in the Holocaust anyway which means she is a hate filled bigot that wanted to kill all the Jews!
The above quote is a good example of a non-sequitor argument. If the foe is engaged in this rhetoric, it is pointless to continue the debate or respond any further because he/she is already in error. The only thing we can do is point their argument is a non-sequitor and that’s that.Always keep in mind that any attempt to continue a non-sequitor argument will only lead to even further logical traps and fallacies set by the enemy leaving you in a very vulnerable situation. So tread carefully.Ad-Hominem:
The Latin word for “To the man” or “To the person”.
Ad-Hominem argument is logical fallacy which an argument or subject is rebutted by attacking the character, personality, beliefs, or any personal characteristics of the Aryanist/National-Socialist instead of dealing with the subject itself. In other words, good old insults…
If the foe is engaged in this illogical fallacy then it is pointless to continue the debate/conversation and the foe loses the any right to respond any further.Babel:
The fallacy known as Babel is the deliberate confusion of language and terminology used by the Aryanist/National Socialists by the enemy.
You see, the Aryanist/National Socialists have agreed to certain terms of language and terminology allowing us to communicate each other properly. The foe will try to confuse them or render them irrelevant by not applying them.
Whether intentional or unintentional, the Aryan cannot properly answer the subject unless proper terminology and terms are applied and/or used.Subject Switching/Red Herring:
Another favorite tactic by the enemy is changing the subject or in other words, in simple terms: talking something else.
The purpose of this rhetoric is to prevent any conclusion or any logical resolution by changing the subject or distracting you with irrelevant topics/subjects in order to disrupt the flow of the conversation or subject.
In this way, the foe can control and direct the flow of the information under their terms leaving us in a very vulnerable situation.Hijacking:
When a Hijacker successfully hijacks a conversation or subject, he/she then disrupts the said subject/conversation by changing the flow of the subject in their own terms. When someone tries to return to the original subject, he/she will then defend their motive of changing the subject humorously or aggressively. Preventing any attempt to return to the original subject properly.
The purpose of this propaganda method is to disrupt any logical conclusions and/or resolution by the agreeing parties by the enemy.Dead Weight/Time Wasting:
Another typical foe method…
There are many variants of this rhetoric ranging from seemingly innocent and subtle (like keeping asking for more questions) to downright mundane and vulgar (like insults... As usual). But main essence will always remains the same…
Whether it is intentional (by the foe) or unintentional (usually by the ignorant plebeians), the purpose of a Dead Weight is just to simply waste the time and energy of any active Aryanist/National-Socialist.Appeal to the Authority:
One of the favorite tactics of the enemy against their foes and hated enemies is by discrediting and/or invalidating their argument by the appealing to the authority.Example:Foe: Why should I believe you? You are not qualified engineer blah, blah, blah, blah…
Remember this important fact in your head; the entire principles that make up our world that we currently live today (especially our current legal system) are based on fallacy…
There is no professional lawyer, teacher, writer, scholar, judge, politician, priest, monarch, etc. have any right or power over you. In the true authentic legal system, you can only be judged by your own peers. Nothing more, nothing else.Suspension of Disbelief
Another favorite common rhetoric tactic used by the foe. Rather than using cold hard data to back up his/her subject, the foe instead manipulates or simply takes advantage the feelings and emotions of the audience or the debater in order to validate his/her argument. In short, an appeal to emotions.Dissimulation
The word for "to hide and conceal ones motive" as well as the word for feigning hypocrisy.
Dissimulation is when the foe tries to combines or have combined two or more dissimilar and contradicting ideas and presenting them as equally true... This rhetoric is either used for propaganda purposes to advance their
motives or the foe is just simply feigning mental complications or maybe even both...
And this concludes our Rhetoric for Propagandist page.
By understanding these simple basic methods of the enemy, not only we can avoid any casualties in the future but we will also avoid any unintentional friendly fire as well as exposing any hidden agenda of any potential foes in the future.
Always remember, Seig Heil and Hail Hitler 卐
Well, that took longer than I expected. But I've finally done it! After a few months of writers block and lack of inspiration, It is finally finished!
While I am fully aware that I might have overlook and missed some important info and details there and there, but that is a problem for another time. This is the first time I have done something like this so cut me some slack!
By the way, if there is something that you would like to add or something to point out, then you are feel free to ask questions!
Added "Suspension of Disbelief" and "Dissimulation" in the Rhetorics page and made some minor text adjustment.